Global Day for Darfur IV – Joint Policy Statement
September 17 marks the anniversaries of two important civil society and governmental initiatives to improve the international community’s response to violent conflicts such as the tragedy that is currently unfolding
in Darfur – the first Global Day for Darfur and the UN’s adoptions of the Responsibility to Protect doctrine. Despite those and subsequent efforts,
however, the situation in Darfur remains dire, with hundreds of thousand additionally displaced, and untold numbers killed. Efforts to limit the
suffering through the provision of humanitarian aid are under increasing strain due to violence and rampant harassment, while efforts to advance a just and inclusive peace process have repeatedly
been stalled due to violence. Four million people are now affected by the crisis, which has spread from Sudan into Chad and the Central African
Republic. And yet international governmental efforts to end the conflict have fallen far short of what is necessary to provide peace and protection to
the people of Darfur, failing the ideals enshrined in the Responsibility to Protect and reiterated in countless speeches by world leaders.
In an attempt to move beyond words and into action, the United Nations Security Council unanimously passed Resolution 1769 on July
31, authorizing a hybrid United Nations – African Union peacekeeping mission in Darfur (UNAMID) and calling for an immediate cessation of hostilities.
While these sentiments are certainly welcome, the past year witnessed several failed UN resolutions and ceasefire agreements. For the first time in
history, the international community which comprises the UN failed to deploy a peacekeeping force authorized by the Security Council – the force intended for Darfur authorized last August 31 in
Resolution 1706. The international community’s failures which led to the collapse of 1706, and there were many, can be traced in large part to the
lack of a coordinated, multilateral approach to its implementation. It is painfully clear that a much greater effort will be required of all relevant
actors – including nations large and small as well as international organizations such as the UN and AU – in order to give Resolution 1769 a real chance to succeed where 1706 has so recently and
historically failed. The full and swift deployment of UNAMID will help protect civilians, and help lend strength to the latest round of peace talks
begun recently in Arusha, Tanzania.
In order to help ensure the achievement of the twin goals of peace and protection for the people of Darfur, [Nation] and the
international community must take the following actions:
Substantively Contribute to the Deployment of UNAMID
In order to fully and swiftly implement Resolution 1769 and thereby help realize the twin goals of peace and protection, the United
Nations, African Union, European Union, Arab League, and UN member states – with a special focus on members of the Security Council and the Government of Sudan – must all do their
part. Put simply, all nations and relevant international organizations must contribute what they can to help end the crisis in Darfur.
Within the context of their capacities, each nation and international organization should contribute troops, police, funding,
equipment, logistical support, diplomatic and if necessary economic pressure, and in the case of Sudan full cooperation and facilitation.
Additionally, the Secretary-General of the United Nations and the Chairman of the African Union must ensure that any and all bureaucratic delays to deployment are eliminated if possible and
minimized if not. It is also imperative that nations honor prior unfulfilled financial commitments to the current African Union Mission in Sudan
(AMIS) to ensure its continued operation until such time as it is folded into the UNAMID command and payment structure.
The responsibility of implementing Resolution 1769 authorizing the hybrid UN-AU peacekeeping mission to Darfur falls on all nations
and international organizations, with special leadership necessary from the UN and AU themselves, and with the full cooperation of the Sudanese government. If the Sudanese government should choose to renege on its commitments, as it has done repeatedly in the past, the international community must be prepared to use
all necessary diplomatic and economic leverage – including targeted multilateral sanctions – to punish Sudanese obstruction. The UN Secretary-General
and Security Council must also ensure that UNAMID’s mandate to proactively protect civilians is being strongly interpreted and broadly enforced
through consistent monitoring of and reporting on the steps being taken by the AU-UN Joint Special Representative Rodolphe Adada, Force Commander Martin Agwai, and their deputies. If it is found that the UNAMID’s mandate is not being effectively pursued, the Secretary-General and Security Council should take appropriate steps as necessary
to ensure the proactive protection of civilians.
[COUNTRY SPECIFIC ASKS]
Demand an Immediate Cessation of Hostilities
The full and swift deployment of the UNAMID force is crucial to increasing security for civilians and humanitarian aid workers over
time, but the promise of much-needed peacekeepers tomorrow will not reduce the violence today. All parties to the conflict must therefore use this
opportunity to respect a total cessation of hostilities. Such action would be consistent with Resolution 1769 and with past unfulfilled agreements to
cease hostilities. All nations and international organizations should contribute to achieving the critical mass of pressure necessary to convince all
combatants that it is in their best interest to end their fighting and thereby help create space for the furtherance of the peace process.
[COUNTRY SPECIFIC ASKS]
Support a Robust and Effective peace process
If there is to be a sustainable end to the violence in Darfur, there must be an effective and inclusive peace process to arrive at a
final political solution to the conflict, thereby allowing IDPs and refugees to safely and voluntarily return home. The current process, jointly led by the UN and AU, offers some hope –
especially insofar as it has consolidated what have been numerous and at times competing peace initiatives – but this UN-AU effort faces many obstacles as well. The rebel factions remain largely divided, a climate of insecurity continues to be fueled both by Khartoum and by inter-faction violence, major Darfuri leaders
have refused to participate in the negotiations, and the UN-AU peace process team is under-staffed and lacking robust leadership. The international community must provide diplomatic, political,
and financial support to the UN-AU initiative, and insist that it include input not just from the rebel groups, but also from IDPs, local tribal leaders, Arab groups not aligned with the
government, and women, as envisioned by the Darfur-Darfur dialogue. Additionally, the international community must press important regional actors –
especially Libya, Eritrea, and Chad – to play a productive role in promoting, not obstructing, the peace process.
Commentaires Récents